Things I DON’T get.

First of all, I apologize for not having the image not being a good representation of what I am typing about. I am currently out of town and most of my images are on HD’s at home.

The other day I had talked about some things that I “get” in reference to how we photographers should study other art forms to improve our photography. For example, a knowledge of design would immensely help our images. I tried to relate how athletes cross-train to improve their game and how artists can do the same. I try to expose myself to other forms of art to get inspiration and a better understand how to express my own voice.

HOWEVER… there are some art forms or genre’s that I just “don’t get”. I like to think that I have an  open mind to different things but some things just do not tickle my fancy. Perhaps, I am not as sophisticated an art consumer as I wished to be.  Anyways, here are a few things that I “don’t get”.

  • Opera

First of all, I guess it would help that I spoke Italian or whatever language Opera singer’s sing in. That would definitely help me. I understand Opera’s move people emotionally with a story of tragedy. I “get that” but not in the way the message is sent. I would rather see a movie that tells the same story than a soprano belting out super high pitched notes in which I don’t understand. Don’t get me wrong, I totally appreciate the singer’s ability but there is a point where sometimes it just hurts my ears. I find baritone much easier on my ear drums.

  • Abstract Expressionism

I don’t get this at all. Jackson Pollack literally throws paint on a canvas. The result looks like a paint mess to me. I just don’t see anything for my brain to connect with. To me, it’s just a mess of paint -plain and simple. I have seen better pictures painted my elephants in Thailand. Perhaps, if Jackson had painted a little more “literal”, I may get it. However, he didn’t so I don’t get it. Unless, it’s just decoration. Maybe the colours go well with the couch? Regardless, I don’t “get” what Jackson was expressing.

  • Modern Dance

I think ballet  could be included in this “performance art”.  I am very amazed by the dancer’s athletic abilities and their body control but… I don’t get what they are trying to say. Maybe they are not trying to say anything? Maybe they are showcasing their body strength, flexibility, and control. Maybe, I need a more literal interpretation. I don’t know. What I do know is that I appreciate the creativity of the modern dancers. Modern dance was developed by breaking traditional dance rules. That part is what I have a huge appreciation for. As for viewing… it doesn’t usually keep me engaged.

Conclusion

By all means, I do not intend to dis-respect the artist and fans of these art forms. It’s just that sometimes, I just don’t get it. What I am trying to say is that just because I “don’t get” a form of expression doesn’t mean that I don’t appreciate the skill, talent, or creativity that was put into the art form. Maybe I need to be more educated. Maybe I am just not culturally sophisticated enough to “get” some of these things and I need to go to finishing school.

Maybe, it’s just a matter of taste. Many people love eating salmon but I only like it as sushi. How did I know that I don’t like cooked salmon? I’ve tried it many times. That’s how I figure out what I like… and what I don’t like.

Anyways, I’ll be seeing some of you at ART in Port Townsend. I am sure we will be discussing many things such as this.

 

 

 

 

 

 

3 thoughts on “Things I DON’T get.

  1. Different strokes for different folks, hey?!

    I’m kind of with you on the opera, although…saying that…I went ONE time to a modern interpretation of something (whoops, can’t remember!), and it was sung in English and easy to follow. So, maybe that doesn’t count…

    I do enjoy modern dance though. Maybe because I used to have friends who were contemporary dancers. I was always so envious of their abilities and strength, and I just love watching the amazing limits to which the human body can be pushed.

    I often don’t “get” what they’re expresssing, but that’s OK with me. Often art is something we feel rather than understand. That’s my take on it anyway! I’m often very bad at articulating why something moves me, but I know when I experience something as art.

  2. I don’t “get” a lot of conceptual art. I recently attended an exhibition opening and the one artist had 7 completely different pieces on show, each one using a different medium (photography, etching, sculpture, drawing, etc.) I read the artist’s statement 3 times and still could not figure out what tied all the pieces together. One piece was a long piece of wood leaning up in a corner, and it was oh so subtly tapered at one end.
    I have better luck with conceptual photography, but even there I have moments of “what?”
    But still I go to shows, because sometimes there is a piece that I might not “get” but I still really like.

  3. @Cathy -I agree. Modern dancers do some amazing things with their bodies. No question about that. However, if I want to see something amazing in that respect, I prefer Cirque Du Sol to see some amazing acts. At least they make the story or expression obvious for the people, like myself.

    @Liisa -”not get” something but still like it? That is interesting. I am sure I have run into that before but can’t recall.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>